Oh, come on, the Republicans are getting a bit ridiculous!
I’m reading this story on Huffington Post about the upcoming Supreme Court decision on the Individual Mandate in the Health care law. The article supports the notion that there are a lot of things the government mandates that everyone must do. The example used is Medicare. If you work, you pay into Medicare – you have no choice.
But, here’s what really got to me: Mark Hayes – “former chief health counsel for the Republican staff of the Senate Finance Committee” states:
“Congress used more clearly defined constitutional powers when it created Medicare. “The power to tax and the power to spend…” “‘Here, with the individual mandate, it’s a different question – regulating interstate commerce. This is a novel question from a legal standpoint.'”
How is that novel? Article I Section 8 Clause 3 states:
“To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;”
Novel question? Um, I don’t think so. The word Novel, when used as an adjective and not as a noun means:
- new and not resembling something formerly known or used
- original or striking especially in conception or style
Um, if the Commerce Clause has existed in the Constitution since the beginning, how is Congress being able to use it now a “Novel” question?
I’m just wondering.