Who tells the truth the most often? Who gets it right? Check out the image below.
Paul Ryan announced that he and Mitt Romney will wait until they’re elected to tell us just what tax loopholes they plan on closing. (See story here) Really?
That’s like going to buy a car and having the dealer say, “This is a great car with a lot of features, but I’m not showing you any of them until you sign on the dotted line.”
Mitt Romney “was overheard telling supporters at a private fundraiser in Florida over the weekend that he might seek to limit tax deductions for mortgages”. (See story here) Naturally, his campaign made him back away from this remark.
But, what exactly would Romney and Ryan cut to make up for the “$5 trillion in forgone revenue“.
Cheryl and I all ready pay thousand dollars in taxes higher than a couple is allowed to legally marry. So, take away my mortgage deduction and I can kiss a lot more of my hard earned money to go up in smoke. And, why should I vote for someone who won’t even tell me to my face that, yes, I’m taking away your largest deduction, so I can cut taxes on the ultra-rich?
I know a lot of people who are planning to vote for Romney and they’re going to be bitching if he runs and passes a radical tax law.
But, they will tell you a lot about their Medicare system. Romney gave some details to reporters in Miami:
“My plan for Medicare is very similar to his plan for Medicare. My plan, like his, really expands Medicare Advantage. It says, let’s give people more opportunity to take advantage of not just the standard Medicare, but also the [private insurance] policies that are available in the market place.”
Get it? They want to privatize more Medicare, but they don’t want to tell you what tax deductions they’re ending. And, they send out their main man (John Sununu) to keep repeating the lie of the $716 billion Obama “gutted” from Medicare”.
Let me start this by telling you about my neighbor. My neighbor is a Republican and she’s on disability (which I think shouldn’t happen, but there it is). She’s a good Christian woman, who suffered through an intolerable childhood and never married. She worked, before her illness, in the Health Care field. She offers advice, even when you don’t need it or want it. My neighbor knows every thing that goes on in our neighborhood and I mean every thing. I’ll be she’ll know about this post before I finish writing it and before I even post it. Even when she was working, she knew every thing.
In the old days, we would call her – unkindly – the neighborhood gossip or busy buddy. And, perhaps, that’s what she is. But, she’s always kind, very giving and the kind of neighbor you can call when you need help. For example, when we were having our biggest trouble with Oliver, she would take him every single day. She helped train him and I think he’s more well-adjusted now than he would’ve been without her daily care. Only her illness stopped her from continuing to watch him, but she’s never stopped loving him.
Over the weekend, she stopped with her little dog for a visit. We had a nice time, even though I have no manners and forgot to offer her a drink or something. Anyway, she told me that she was going to vote for Romney in the Presidential election. When I asked her why, since it is clear she doesn’t like Romney, her answer was abortion. Republicans are against abortion. She’s against abortion, so she’s going to vote for Romney.
And, that is why I’m writing this. The anti-abortion stance in the Republican Party is a lie. Mark my words: There will NEVER be a Federal Anti-abortion – I mean make it back like it was – law EVER. It doesn’t matter if the Republicans hold Congress, Senate and the White House. It didn’t happen during Bush’s eight years (where they had all three for more than 4 years) and it will never happen.
Because abortion is an issue that keeps voters voting Republican. A Federal Ban would mean that the voters would have to look for something else. There are plenty of voters, like my neighbor, who is a one issue voters. She doesn’t want abortion to be legal. She doesn’t realize that the Republicans don’t really want to outlaw it because maybe she might start looking at their other issues.
So, if you’re a single issue voter and abortion is your issue and that’s why you’re voting for Romney – you might want to think again. And, you might want to see what else Romney has in his bag of issues.
This is an actual quote from Mitt Romney from Mitt Romney.com:
“I think this is a time when young people are questioning the support they gave to President Obama three and a half years ago. He promised bringing the country together; that sure hasn’t happened. He promised a future with good jobs and good opportunity; that hasn’t happened. And the pathway that he pursued is one which has not worked. Young people recognize that and I think that’s why they’re going to increasingly look for a different approach.” –Mitt Romney
Below the quote, there are links to the “facts” that support his data. Two links to the same Time Magazine article written by Josh Sanburn (which I haven’t read) from February of this year, there’s a couple of links to the Bureau of Labor Statistics website and some more links to articles .
Here’s the thing: Mitt Romney is hoping that you won’t research any farther than that. He’s hoping that he can convince you that President Obama hasn’t done enough and he’s handing you little tidbits that support his claim.
So, I did the research myself. Below is a chart. This is the annual unemployment rate (seasonally adjusted) from 1948 until 2011. I’ve broken the data down by age: 16 – 24 and over 25. The third line is the combined annual unemployment rate. I obtained the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics site. (Side note: If you love data, like I love data, you could spend hours on this site running queries!)
Here’s the thing: Romney is trying to make you think that somehow our youth have it so much worse than the rest of us and President Obama is responsible for it. However; the truth is that the unemployment rate for 16 – 24 year olds has always been higher than the unemployment rate for the rest of the population.
According to CNN, a Gallup Poll, Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney are the GOP’s top contenders for the Presidency. Palin must be letting this go to her head because she’s going to rev up a bus and go on tour of the nation. Here’s one thing with which Palin and I agree. The best years of our nation are stretched out in front of us. Here’s where we differ, if Sarah Palin is elected President, those days may never come.
According to the Poll, Romney has garnered “17 percent of Republicans and GOP leaning independents”, Palin has 15. Quite frankly, people, that’s nothing to write home about. 15%? Peanuts. 17% – not enough. Besides, the position isn’t for President of the Republicans. It is President of the United States. Romney barely has a chance and Palin should save the bus fair.
There was a time in America where you graduated from high school, started a job at a local business, worked there for thirty years and retired – with a full pension and, in some cases, medical benefits. That was back when American Corporations still cared about their employees. It was back before the Supreme Court stated that Corporations are people and should have the same rights. It was back when unions were strong in this nation. It was back when “the average CEO of a major corporation made 42 times the average hourly worker’s pay”. (Quote link)
Sadly, those days are gone.
Those of us who are not among the wealthy have been handed a bunch of malarkey from our leaders – the politicians, the management at many companies and even our talk show hosts. We’ve been told that what’s bad for business is bad for jobs. We’ve been told that moving factories to Mexico and importing goods from China is good for American companies and, therefore, good for those of us who work for a living. We’ve been told that tax cuts for the rich and lowering the corporate tax rate will help bring jobs back to our neighborhoods. We’ve been told that regulating the financial market is bad and deregulation is good.
All of this has been one great big lie. Case in point: tax cuts. Corporations are paying lower taxes than they have in half a century and, yet, they didn’t keep people on the payrolls. Wonder why? Another case is the financial market breakdown. We’ve spent the last 30 years (and especially the last eighteen years) dismantling the regulations enacted during the depression that were designed to prevent the exact kind of meltdown our financial market suffered in 2008. And, we’ve been told it was a good thing.
Now, Mitt Romney, in an opinion piece in USA Today, claims that people on unemployment don’t really want to work. Does this man have a clue? Does he get it? He says (and I’m quoting because unlike Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, I don’t make shit up!), “The indisputable fact is that unemployment benefits, despite a web of regulations, actually serve to discourage some individuals from taking jobs, especially when the benefits extend across years.”
I’ve been on unemployment three times in my life – never for more than six months – it was some of the worst times. The idea that an American worker prefers unemployment is absurd. My salary on unemployment would drop by 72%. I can’t make my bills on that. Now, I’m very fortunate – I am employed and in the last nine years, I have been unemployed for a grand total of one week – and I was paid by my ex-employer for that week and the one after it. I have a friend who has been unemployed for a year and a half. I can tell you that she’d rather be working. In fact, I do not know one unemployed person who has said, “Gee, I love my unemployment insurance! I guess I won’t look for a job!”
Romney is trying to convince the American Public that the unemployed are lazy and don’t want to work. Where have we heard that before? (Hint: Rush Limbaugh)
He goes on to say this (and the emphasis is mine):
“The system is also not designed for a flexible economy like ours in which some employees move from job to job for short periods, and are therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation when they are faced with a protracted spell without work.
To remedy such problems we need a very different model, perhaps establishing individual unemployment savings accounts over which employees would exercise direct control when they lose their jobs, or putting in place financial incentives for employers to hire and train the long-term unemployed.”
How many people in our economy really “move from job to job for short periods”? I’m betting not many. Even contractors work for just one company and, apparently Mitt has never been on unemployment, it is tracked for all of your employment. Every state is different, but most states ask about your work history for the previous year and then you’re covered. I believe he’s way off base.
But, his idea of unemployment savings accounts? What is his problem? So, now we’re responsible for our own retirement (no company pensions) and we’re going to have to come up with money to put aside in case our employer lays us off? Just where is the average American worker supposed to get the money? American Families are hard pressed for cash now, imagine them trying to save for college, health care, retirement AND unemployment.
As far as put in place incentives for employers, please – big eye roll – they all ready have plenty of incentives. But, I do have a plan – triple their taxes and give them a tax break for every new hirer. Take away their profits in taxes unless they hire more people. Make companies that earned a profit, but laid off employees pay 85% of the profit in taxes unless they hire back 50% of the laid off employees. How’s that for an incentive? Start putting high tariffs on products made overseas and imported here – include American companies in the mix, so they have an incentive to build plants here.
American companies have had it easy for the last thirty years and take a good look at where it’s gotten us. It’s time for the American Workers to take back the wheel and drive this bus!